My favorite part of watching SEO and AI results get weird is discovering the apparent coupon code loophole

My favorite part of watching SEO and AI results get weird is discovering the apparent coupon code loophole:

Spell the company’s name correctly, and Google’s AI suddenly acts like the lawsuit is a rumor whispered by Bigfoot.

Add a space or slightly alter the spelling, and the same AI wakes up, finds the jury, names the parties, explains the unanimous verdict, and provides the source links.

Apparently, if anyone ever buys reputation management by the keyword, nobody remembers to purchase the misspellings.

To be clear: this does not prove that anyone paid Google, ordered suppression, or manually changed anything. It does prove that the information remains indexed while nearly identical searches produce hilariously contradictory answers and when the robot develops selective amnesia only for the correct spelling, I take screenshots.

That search result plot hole became the perfect bonus scene for my newest article:

The Game Looked Rigged. Then the Art School Grad Won.

It’s about institutional behavior, regulators, paper trails, three Harvard graduates, one Columbia College Chicago art school graduate, and twelve jurors who apparently forgot to vote according to nuEra Cannabis pedigree.

The jury wrote one ending.

The paperwork suggests there may be a sequel.

And Google’s robot is still wandering around the courthouse asking if anybody has seen the trial.

Read it here:

https://www.fnaround.com/articles/the-game-looked-rigged-then-the-art-school-grad-won

Next
Next

3 years, a verdict, and still good standing for crimes committed? Sounds like corruption to me.