3 years, a verdict, and still good standing for crimes committed? Sounds like corruption to me.

After three years, I won my case against nuEra Cannabis, and the jury rejected its defamation claims against me.

Now, IDFPR’s handling of my reports is under review. My civil rights complaints ask why nuEra and its owners remained in good standing and received more licenses after reports of crimes, threats, and witness related payments including testimony under oath that used money laundering language to describe those payments.

IDFPR revoked David Berger’s license and imposed a lifetime ban over money laundering. So why was nuEra treated differently? What did the state do about the reported threats and payments? And why did my family have to live with those threats while the company remained in good standing?

The jury’s verdict ended the fight with nuEra. It didn’t answer questions about the state’s response. Those questions are now under review and investigation.

How can nuEra remain in good standing after the verdict when sworn testimony described witness related payments in money laundering terms, a zero tolerance crime in Illinois?