Civil rights investigation started againstt IDFPR
UPDATE: The civil rights complaint against Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation wasn't rejected. The Attorney General accepted it and opened it for investigation.
A unanimous verdict. Under oath testimony by ownership describing $300,000 plus in witness related payments using money laundering language to explain how it wasn't a bribe.
Using David Berger from Ivy Hall as my example to show selective enforcement. Then additional licenses issued after the verdict despite reports of zero tolerance felony conduct.
You know how one crooked lawyer can make everyone revisit every case they touched?
Did one post verdict licensing announcement just open
Pandora's box for an entire regulatory body and the industry it regulates?
Let's find out.
Didn't I explain through my Structural Gravity work exactly where this was going?
Any veteran remember what happens when one person gets the entire unit inspected? If your books aren't clean, feel free to thank nuEra Cannabis when | leave the room.
Because F'nAround is about to start digging...
As many of you paying attention know: I won my case, and Juan and I defeated the claims brought against us.
So what does the F'nDoctor do next?
Let's be transparent again. I enjoy telegraphing my moves years in advance and waiting for everyone's reactions to catch up.
It's like a game of chess.
Dr. Finch plans to pursue his appeal. At trial, testimony confirmed that nuEra Cannabis ownership helped finance his case against Illinois which reached the Illinois Supreme Court and communicated with his attorneys. Under oath, Bob Fitzsimmons indicated he wasn't the only funder.
Remember when I said I was tracking who supplied whom, who carried whose products and which companies maintained business relationships?
That wasn't random.
My lawsuit against nuEra Cannabis may be finished. The larger problem isn't.
My family was threatened. Bribes were offered. Witnesses were pressured. Testimony addressing witness related payments used the description of money laundering. State institutions received reports, yet no prosecution apparent to us tollowed.
Then the state continued issuing licenses and good-standing determinations.
So what comes next?
Oh, right: federal court.
The next chapter concerns civil-rights claims against state actors and institutions. We already started the filings. The question is no longer only what private actors allegedly dia, it is what government institutions did after they were told.
That is why I requested the names, routing histories, assignments and audit logs. Who received the reports? Who reviewed them? Where did they go? Why did approvals continue?
Didn't I post years ago that I was told the state protects them? Didn't I say that I would fix that?
Who watches the watchmen?
From here, the players change, the sides change, and the last several years become evidence, timelines and receipts.
One small complication for anyone who thought this would remain a dispute over competing stories:
The threats were recorded. The bank records printed. The witnesses wrote statements.
Probably should have thought about that before letting me keep the receipts.
The planning was always published.
The timing and ending?
That part was up to the world.
Catch up on the timeline on F'nAround...