Idfpr mandatory reporting part 2

You know… It’s easy to understand why I got accepted into a PhD research program for systems theory and government analysis.

F'nAround was the perfect doctoral capstone for that thesis.

And the original thesis question I built for that capstone is now the foundation for the PhD research. Gravitas Satanae ( www.fnaround.com/gravitassatanae )

Because once you start mapping procedural gravity wells, the signals become really bright.

Last week:

Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation asked for an extension to determine whether any records existed showing exemptions or approvals related to conduct Illinois calls “zero tolerance.”

Hours after we publicly joked about the extension?

“No responsive records.”

This week’s request becomes even funnier from a systems-analysis perspective:

If no exemptions existed…

then what did the system do when the conduct itself was disclosed?

Did it trigger review?

Referral?

Investigation?

Reporting?

Or does gravity bend differently depending on who enters orbit?

This is why systems theory is hilarious.

Not because one delay proves anything.

It doesn’t.

But because once enough procedural patterns accumulate, even academics start looking at the same thing and going:

“…wait a second.”

Anyway.

Back to testing gravity where systems insist it doesn’t exist.

www.fnaround.com/articles/idfpr