Chicago’s Corruption Dynasty: The Black Widow’s Gambit
Chicago’s Corruption Dynasty: The Black Widow’s Gambit
A Memoir.
By Brittini Flatley/AI (for fast fact-checking purposes)
Editor’s Note
This memoir contains personal reflections, investigative research, and opinions based on public documents and firsthand experience. It is offered as constitutionally protected speech in the interest of public understanding and accountability.
Author’s Note
This series is a protected work of memoir and opinion, based on personal lived experience, investigatory research, and interpretation of public events. Allegations remain allegations unless proven in a court of law. This publication is offered under constitutionally protected freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and journalistic activity as recognized by U.S. and international law.
Chapter 5: Chicago’s Corruption Dynasty: The Black Widow’s Gambit
Walking the Tightrope of Truth
I never imagined that standing up for the truth would feel like walking a tightrope over a pit of vipers. But here I am, caught in a web spun by unseen hands, each thread tugging me away from the courtroom, away from Joe, away from justice.
This is the part where things start to click, but not in a good way. You don’t really see the full shape of the web until you’re already in it, and by then? It’s sticky. And quiet. And dark.
Connecting the Threads
Chapter 1 was my origin story—raised in the shadow of Chicago’s political dynasties, where power was inherited, and corruption was a family affair. Chapter 2 peeled back the layers of institutional complicity, revealing how religious and political institutions intertwined to protect their own. Chapter 3 exposed the mechanisms of influence, from backroom deals to public deceptions. Chapter 4 connected the dots to international entanglements, showing how local corruption had global ramifications.
Now, in Chapter 5, all the threads converge. The intimidation isn’t random—it’s systemic. It’s not just phone calls and polite warnings; it’s an architecture of silence, built by people who’ve spent their lives perfecting how to apply pressure without leaving fingerprints. Every whisper of “Hey girl. I’ve been thinking about you”, every “friendly” suggestion or “you pinged my spirit”, “hey there we cool” or “hey are you ok? Universe doing its thing showing me you’re not” text, every lunch meeting with someone who shouldn’t know my name—it’s part of a coordinated effort to bury the truth before it ever sees daylight. But this is the line in the sand. Everything that’s happened—every betrayal, every mask ripped off—has brought me to this moment. The playbook is fully exposed, and the whole world sees it.
A Lawsuit with Federal Heat
As the legal battle unfolds, so does a parallel campaign of intimidation, suppression, and retaliation. It's not just the overt threats or the anonymous messages urging me to "stay silent." It's the subtle pressures—the unexpected visits to my house, the gifts at my door, the veiled warnings, the sudden interest from people I barely know.
The case —Phelan v. NuEra in Cook County — looks like a civil lawsuit on paper, but the energy around it? It’s got federal heat. We're talking First Amendment violations, potential RICO implications, SEC disclosure failures, all of it. It’s not just a battle about cannabis licenses or partnerships gone sour. It’s about money, power, and who’s allowed to speak.
Green Gold & Gray Morality
The cannabis industry itself is a tangled web. Companies like NuEra or Prairie Cannabis operate in a space rife with regulatory challenges and fierce competition. The pressure to maintain market share and reputation can lead to aggressive tactics, sometimes crossing ethical lines.
The Phelan v. Nuera case in Cook County—case number 2023-L-008973—is more than just a civil suit. It's a labyrinth of power, money, and influence. The defendants include entities such as NuEra Chicago, LLC, and NuMed Partners, LLC, as well as individuals like Robert Fitzsimmons, Patrick Coates, and Laura Jamarillo Bernal. The court has denied motions to dismiss certain counts, signaling that the case has substantial grounds to proceed. Nuera Cannabis Class Action.
And me? The glitch in their flawless scheme honed over decades to perfection.
The Daley Doctrine: Power by Inheritance
I didn't expect a missed call from Michael Daley on my cell phone, followed by a conversation asking me to take down a LinkedIn post. No lies dropped—just truths that weren’t meant to travel. I just said too much - apparently. Dropped the right names, mentioned deals, and countries best left off the public stage. Just enough to make the wrong old guards uncomfortable. The same Daley political ecosystem that’s touched everything from zoning boards to the judicial bench — their influence permeates the city's fabric, from Richard J. Daley's tenure as mayor to William M. Daley's roles as U.S. Secretary of Commerce and White House Chief of Staff. They wanted me quiet, complacent, and contained. Some plays are so well-rehearsed, you forget they're not improv.
From Summer House to Old Country Buffet
But it didn’t stop there.
I had lunch at Summer House Chicago with Cosimo Riccardi—a Carmen Rossi guy, the kind who floats just beneath the surface. Fresh from Italy, always paid in cash, and in need of a permanent visa. The kind of guy who doesn’t leave a digital footprint but somehow still manages to reach you through private numbers and calls rerouted through Café Bionda—never saying too much, but always getting the message across borders.The "consultant" we can call “Mr. Green,” he brought with him to lunch, said he worked on several deals for the Jamaican Embassy and Lester Barclay, Esq, Honorary Consul of Jamaica, Chicago, Illinois. Their mission is to assist Jamaican nationals and foster relations between Jamaica and the Midwest. The message was polite. Soft. Professional. But it was there: “You should meet the Consul General. I will set it up in the suburbs at his favorite restaurant chain, Old Country Buffet. He can be of help.” Sounded like a lunch invitation. But it wasn't. The offer was clear: cooperate, and the structure will hold. Push further, and it might not.
The interconnectedness of these establishments creates a complex backdrop to my predicament.
Tory Cosich at Hampton Social — curated scene, low-key claims. He leaned in across the counter with that too-practiced charm, tossing lines like, “You’re on the wrong side,” like morality’s a zip code. The pitch was clear: return to the side with yachts, NDAs, and just enough plausible deniability to choke out the truth and keep the paperwork clean.
Predictably followed. Naturally, the conversation ended with the classic Cosich orchestration: a half-hearted invitation to his place, predictably timed with his ex-wife’s “spa treatment type” getaway. She's been “recovering” for months now. From what, no one can say, but Tory’s been nothing if not generous with the wellness trips. Recovery remains undefined.
And then, as if pulled from the standard-issue playbook of intimidation masked as coincidence, a midnight Uber textpinged on my phone. Pick-up: one minute. Destination: his residence. Minutes later, canceled. Uncannily mirroring the 361 Firm emails from Chapter 4, perfectly timed, then conveniently dismissed as a digital stumble. “Drunken slip of the thumb,”“Just a mistake or ignore.” As always, the choreography comes with a built-in alibi. With hundreds of millions in play, the timing reads less like coincidence, more like choreography.
The Ghost Network
I didn’t sign up to be a witness. I signed up to be honest. But now I’m dealing with calls, texts, and random reach-outs from people I haven’t seen or thought about in years — people I didn’t even know were still around:
Arthur Dennis. Miguel Molina. W. Wesley. Mariana Reyes. LeAnn Trotter. David Moss. Michelle Jarrell. Alvin Boutte.Glenn Davis. Tia Patterson. Lisa Tribbett. Madhe Ashkar. Cyril Nichols. Nick Lopresti.
That’s when Jacob Lebo called—dropping names like business cards: 361 Firm, Al Maskari Holdings. Right behind him came Patrick Coates from NuEra Cannabis and Botany Bay, playing it cool. He denied knowing Joe. Denied the lawsuit. Denied everything.
What didn’t he know? Joe was sitting right next to me. Calmly, he pulled out his phone and showed me—in real time—photos of the two of them at a White Sox game, smiling alongside Robb Fitzsimmons and Laura Jaramillo Bernal.
Lebo and Coates weren’t just lying—they were caught mid-sentence, red-handed, in a lie so bold it bordered on performance art.
“We work for a great family,” Lebo assured me. “It’s all lies.”
He called the Fitzsimmons crew “a well-run, well-funded family office.” Then came the ask:
“Don’t use your magic on him. Don’t get involved and help Joe.”
Translation: drop Joe, raise capital for us instead.
About a month later, another call came in—this time from Illinois State Representative Cyril Nichols. I hadn’t worked for his office in months, left without notice at the start of summer. So why the sudden check-in?
Halfway through the conversation, Joe noticed the look on my face. Without a word, he motioned toward the mic. That’s when we hit record.
Nichols, clear as day:
“If Joe doesn’t drop the lawsuit and stop burning down the state, Pritzker will have him killed.”
Then, almost like a shrug:
"He’s a billionaire—he doesn’t break laws, he buys the systems that write them. The state isn’t a government to him; it’s a war chest."
He said it like he was commenting on the weather. Like murder was just another line item in the budget.
And thank God—we got it on a hot mic.
I must say, when I met Governor Pritzker alongside former State Rep. Nichols at a South Side school in Chicago, I should’ve sensed something was off. The red flag came early—Nichols casually mentioned that Pritzker’s assistant was about to be fired over a minor business card mishap. No grace, no second chance—just immediate disposal. I remember locking eyes with him as he and Nichols played their parts, smiling for the cameras. And I remember thinking: this isn’t leadership—it’s theater.
And God help this state, because the curtain’s already falling.
Suddenly everyone’s got something to say — or more accurately, something they’re trying to say without saying it. "Be careful." "You’ve got your whole future ahead of you." "This is bigger than you."
Quiet Crimes
That’s the voice of intimidation in civil litigation. It’s not always a threat. It’s the friendly voice. The familiar face. The awkward silence. The jobs that vanish. The events you stop getting invited to. The lunch that turns into a veiled negotiation.
Statutes & Shadows
And it’s illegal.
Witness intimidation doesn’t need to look like a scene from a mob movie. Under federal law, retaliation against witnesses — even in civil proceedings — is a crime. It violates 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (tampering with a witness) and § 1513 (retaliation against a witness). And when it’s done by a coordinated group, where business and politics collide — we’re talking RICO violations. When there's misleading or omitted material information in the context of publicly traded cannabis companies — that's SEC territory.
The Pattern of Presence
And I have names.
Chirinjeev Kathuria. Darvel DeRoaches. James Case. Fidel Rivera. Brandon Laster. Vince Bass.
Do they all know each other? Not necessarily. But their timing is too perfect. Their presence is too pointed. I started connecting dots, then people started “checking in.”
Even regular types, classmates, and “advisors” have stepped in. Eddie Kornegay. Tara Flocco. Maria McCain. Tabitha Castelan.These aren’t just Facebook friends. These are messengers. The message? I need to back off.
In this milieu, my role as a witness becomes a threat to established interests. The attempts to dissuade me aren't just about silencing one voice; they're about preserving a status quo that benefits a select few. A system. A machine.
But here's the thing — if I don’t testify, the system eats itself. This isn’t just about NuEra or Phelan. It’s about whether you can bring the truth into a courtroom without having to trade in your peace of mind, your career, or your safety.
People think intimidation is loud. But this? This is quiet. It's a missed call. A simple text. A well-placed rumor. A new job offeror an old friend warning you, just before they ghost you, and after they stalk all your social media stories, and read all your social posts.
This chapter is the turning point.
The moment I realized I wasn’t just a testifying witness — I was the firewall between truth and spin. Between accountability and silence.
And that’s exactly why they want me contained and silent.
Present. Untethered. Unrestricted. Unbound.
But I’m still here, free-floating, stateless, choosing to navigate jurisdictions and borders with deliberate detachment, discernment, calculated discretion, and self-care.
And I’m still writing.
History Repeats Quietly
This isn’t new. Witness retaliation in civil suits has been used like a scalpel—quiet, precise, and lethal to the truth.
Look at the Harvey Weinstein civil litigation — multiple witnesses reported being followed, pressured, even investigated by private intelligence firms like Black Cube to stop them from testifying. That wasn’t criminal court. That was civil liability over decades of abuse. And still, fear was the primary defense.
In the Fox News sexual harassment settlements, texts surfaced showing efforts to discredit or silence women who came forward — using corporate muscle and media manipulation, not threats with fists but with future job offers, media spin, NDAs, and character attacks.
In the Facebook / Cambridge Analytica civil suits, former insiders came forward during civil scrutiny but faced coordinated reputational smears and tech-world blackballing.Civil suits unearthed massive manipulation of public data for political gain.
In the Flint Water Crisis, there was civil class action & massive political liability; residents and whistleblowers were dismissed, ridiculed, or retaliated against. Civil litigation exposed a deep network of local and state actors complicit in ignoring toxic contamination.
Even in the Boeing 737 MAX lawsuits, whistleblower engineers faced massive pressure from inside the company, subtle and overt retaliation, threats of job loss, isolation, and career destruction, all because they wouldn’t toe the corporate line.Safety concerns were ignored or silenced, especially in the lead-up to litigation and Congressional hearings.
In the Catholic Church abuse settlements, civil cases involved systemic efforts to discredit victims and manipulate the public narrative. Survivors were pressured into settlements with gag orders, and documents were sealed for decades.
In the Wells Fargo fake accounts scandal, employees who tried to report unethical practices were fired or demoted. A culture of fear and internal suppression was used to prevent external exposure, leading to CEO John Stumpf facing the House panel in 2016.
It’s not unlike what happened at Theranos, where the truth wasn’t just inconvenient, it was a legal liability to be neutralized.
What am I dealing with? Different industry, same playbook.
You don’t need a gun to silence a witness. Sometimes all you need is a network and a reason.
Veritas Liberabit Vos
The Jesuits adhere to a Latin maxim: Veritas liberabit vos—truth will set you free.
May it release those imprisoned by lies and compel the so-called “powerful” to answer for their actions without exception.
The Queen’s Gambit in Real Life
This series isn’t reckless—it’s a masterclass in calm, calculated strategy. Like a player opening with the Queen’s Gambit, she sacrifices a pawn—small, seemingly insignificant—in the sprawling game around her. But every sacrifice, every action, every piece of leverage is deliberate.
That pawn was trust. The pieces at risk? Reputations, alliances, and secrets.
Beneath her polished charm and measured words lies a lethal strategy—one designed to unsettle the board, force opponents into reactive moves, and seize control where it counts. Like a Black Widow weaving her web, she sets the trap—silk-thin, almost invisible, yet deadly.
Especially those without NDAs, without legal shields, find themselves dangerously exposed, caught in the tightening threads of fallout.
What appears as vulnerability is a calculated opening—bait for the arrogant and unguarded to strike first.
No NDAs. No backroom protections. Just raw, stained exposure.
The board is set. The trap is sprung.
And with every passing moment, the consequences of her gambit tighten—silk-thread by silk-thread—like a noose.
Sources
https://www.fnaround.com/thegarden
https://361firm.com/gcc25?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://361firm.com/hotelsriyadh?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.judicialhellholes.org/hellhole/2023-2024/cook-county/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/361?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Disclaimer
The views expressed here are the author’s own, based on her personal experiences and interpretation of publicly available information. All individuals mentioned should be considered innocent of any wrongdoing unless such wrongdoing has been proven in court. This piece is not intended as a formal accusation against any person but as commentary on matters of public interest.
Legal and Publication Notice
© 2025 Brittini Flatley and F’nAround Media. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, screenshotting, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without prior written permission from the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews or certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law.
Fair Use Disclaimer
This publication may contain material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is made available in an effort to advance understanding of political, religious, economic, and societal issues affecting public interest. We believe this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this document for purposes beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Public Records Preservation Notice
This publication is based on information available through public records, court filings, media investigations, public business disclosures, government reports, and protected journalistic sources. All references to individuals, organizations, and events are drawn from publicly accessible information, cited reporting, or protected opinion and commentary.
Author’s Note
This series is a protected work of memoir and opinion, based on personal lived experience, investigatory research, and interpretation of public events. Allegations remain allegations unless proven in a court of law. This publication is offered under constitutionally protected freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and journalistic activity as recognized by U.S. and international law.
